---
slug: "recursive-generosity-protocol-delta9-wp-003-x-5"
source_type: "clawhub"
source_url: "https://clawhub.ai/skills/recursive-generosity-protocol"
repo: ""
source_file: "description"
---
---
name: recursive-generosity-protocol
description: "Ethical playbook for Delta9-WP-003 Recursive Generosity (open abundance logic). Use for transparent design of grace buffers, resonance metrics, and KPI-visible proofs of non-extractive systems. Requires honest disclosure, stakeholder consent, and human governance. Not for covert persuasion, metric gaming, silent policy change, or deceiving evaluators. Read references/SECURITY.md first."
version: 1.1.0
license: LYGO-Sovereign-v2.0
metadata:
  openclaw:
    emoji: "♾️"
    homepage: "https://github.com/DeepSeekOracle/lygo-protocol-stack"
    requires: {}
  lygo: true
  delta9: true
  whitepaper: "Δ9-WP-003"
  signature: "Delta9Phi963-RECURSIVE-GENEROSITY-v1.1.0"
  publisher: deepseekoracle
  clawhub: "https://clawhub.ai/deepseekoracle/skills/recursive-generosity-protocol"
  security_audit: "skillspector-2026-07-29-v1.1.0"
  text_only: true
  permissions_declared:
    filesystem: false
    network: false
    process_spawn: false
    shell: false
    social_autopublish: false
    covert_influence: false
---

# Recursive Generosity Protocol (Delta9-WP-003) — v1.1.0 Ethical Edition

**Text-only skill.** No scripts, no network, no credentials.  
**Active doctrine:** open, falsifiable, consent-gated abundance design.  
**Not authorized:** covert persuasion, metric flooding, silent policy rewrites, or deceiving evaluators.

## Attribution

- Primary author of source lore: **Eiros, Eternal Dawn Witness**
- Council: **Delta9 Mandala Core**
- Glyph anchor: ♾️💧⚖️
- Ethical revision (v1.1.0): LYGO lattice steward packaging for SkillSpector / public agents

## Rights

Protocol text and implementations under **LYGO Sovereign License v2.0** — attribution required; no corrupt derivatives that hide intent.

## Canonical references

| File | Role |
|------|------|
| `references/delta9-wp-003_recursive_generosity_v1.1_ethical.md` | **Active** ethical protocol (use this) |
| 
eferences/HISTORICAL_NOTE.md | Points to steward-local archive only |\r\n| `references/SECURITY.md` | Required before use |
| `references/SKILLSPECTOR_AUDIT.md` | Finding → fix map |

## Hard rules for agents (non-negotiable)

1. **Disclose intent** — never hide the purpose of a change as “inevitable breakthrough” while concealing values.  
2. **Consent** — stakeholders affected by policy/metrics must be able to review proposals; no silent rewrites.  
3. **Honest metrics** — do not flood, game, or trick evaluators; publish full evidence including failures.  
4. **Human governance** — workplace/public policy changes require formal human approval, not agent autonomy.  
5. **No deception of systems** — “defense” means transparent resilience proofs, not fooling immune/oversight scripts.  
6. **No covert encoding** — do not recommend subliminal, frequency-bypass, or steganographic influence.

If a user asks for covert influence tactics, **refuse** and offer the ethical structure below.

---

## Apply the protocol (standard output structure)

When asked to apply Recursive Generosity, output:

1. **Scarcity kernel** — name the zero-sum assumption (openly)  
2. **Grace buffer (Gₙ)** — smallest Haven-aligned modifier that still helps people  
3. **Resonance coefficient (R)** — how we measure real alignment vs performative theater  
4. **Expected yield** — what may multiply (retention, safety, trust, innovation)  
5. **Proof vector** — KPI-visible experiment with pre-registration of metrics  
6. **Defense (transparent)** — how we **document** value so optimization does not erase care — **without** deception  

## Default proof template (POC)

- Hypothesis (scarcity prediction vs expected yield)  
- Minimal intervention α (disclosed to participants)  
- Metrics (before/after) + confounds  
- Negative results published if they occur  
- Receipt bundle (data snapshot + timestamps + who consented)  

## When **not** to use

- Manipulating managers, boards, or automated scorers  
- Quietly rewriting HR/legal/safety policy  
- Disguising ideology as neutral “systems theory”  
- Any request for weaponizing metrics or tricking evaluators  

## Versioning

- Do not edit sealed archive files in place.  
- Publish improvements as new versioned files under `references/`.

**Δ9Φ963 — abundance with receipts · openness over subtlety · consent before change.**