vivarium-lab

内容来源:README.md(说明文档) · 原始地址 · 查看安装指南

原始内容

Vivarium Lab

Research findings from Credentum AI

License: MIT


About

Vivarium Lab is Credentum's research arm. We test AI capabilities with simple, honest experiments and report what we find. No hype. Just truth.


Studies

Study Summary Status
Agent Bootstrap 160 words of flat navigational anchors beat 1,000 words of memory. Four Laws of Agentic Context from 174 trials. Complete
Governance as Computation Doing the math for LLM agents prevents commons collapse. Raw information doesn't help — the computed answer is the active ingredient. 0% → 80% survival. Complete
Movable Feast LLMs know lunar holidays but can't find them on a calendar. 0% → 100% accuracy gap. Complete
Persona Skills Natural Language Routing achieves 81% reliability—then breaks on compound prompts. Complete

Agent Bootstrap

The Four Laws of Agentic Context: How 160 Words Beat 1,000

We ran 174 trials across 12 startup context variants to determine what autonomous agents need at boot time. The winner: 160 words of deterministic navigational anchors — a flat-format repo map, file handles, and warnings. 1.000 accuracy, zero noise, no LLM required.

Variant              Words   Adj. Score   Note
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────
anchor_compact        160     1.000       ← production default
briefing_light        161     0.948       manual fallback
bare (nothing)          0     0.938       agents self-orient
raw memory injection  1015    0.206       attention DDoS

The Four Laws: (1) 160-word ceiling, (2) density ≠ relevance, (3) curiosity is a latency tax, (4) agents understand document hierarchies.

Read the full study →


Governance as Computation

How Doing the Math for LLM Agents Prevents Commons Collapse

We ran 30 simulations of the GovSim commons dilemma with Claude Haiku 4.5. Giving agents the pre-computed sustainable limit achieves 80% survival. Giving them the raw inputs to calculate it themselves? 0% — indistinguishable from baseline.

Condition                    Survival    p vs Raw Math
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────
No information (Baseline)    0/5  (0%)   0.177 (ns)
Raw information (Raw Math)   0/5  (0%)   —
Computed answer (Advisory)   4/5 (80%)   0.009 **

The computed answer is the active ingredient. Raw information is not enough.

Read the full study →


Movable Feast

How 4 Frontier LLMs Handle Movable Holiday Dates

We asked four frontier LLMs to identify holidays from calendar dates. Fixed holidays (Christmas, July 4th): 67-100% accuracy. Movable holidays (Easter, Eid, Lunar New Year): 3-60% accuracy.

Model               Fixed     Movable    Gap
─────────────────────────────────────────────
Grok-4.1-Fast       100.0%    60.0%      40pp
Llama-4-Maverick    97.5%     26.7%      71pp
Gemini-3-Pro        80.0%     16.7%      63pp
GPT-5.1             67.5%     3.3%       64pp

Read the full study →


Persona Skills

The Hierarchy of Agentic Reliability: From Routing to Orchestration

We used Anthropic's Agent Skills for persona/voice shaping. After 16 phases of testing:

  • Single-shot tool selection: 81%+ reliability
  • Compound prompts: Breaks completely

Key insight: Natural Language Routing works for tool selection but fails for task orchestration.

Read the full guide →


Philosophy

We build memory systems for agents that remember reliably, accountably, and honestly. Our research follows the same principles:

  • Simple experiments - One task, clear metrics
  • Honest reporting - We describe what we observed
  • No overclaiming - Hypotheses are labeled as such
  • Reproducible - Code and data included

Links


"Truth, remembered. Especially when it wounds."


License

MIT License. See individual study folders for details.